[DRAFT] Amendments to LP Stimulus Plan

Revised LP Stimulus Plan

This is the breakdown of the first proposal towards $MET – the LP Stimulus Plan.

This proposal includes two changes to the initial plan and our thought processes behind these changes.

You can find the initial LP Stimulus Plan proposal laid out by Ben Chow here: 10% LP Stimulus Plan

While the key aspects in the initial proposal like the basic earning mechanism and the official starting date remains unchanged, we will be proposing two changes to ensure a more fair and impactful reward for our users:

  1. Change in total allocation from 10% to 15%
  2. Separate allocation of 3% for Launch Pools and Launch Pads

Let’s break down these proposed changes and our thoughts behind them.

Change in total allocation from 10% to 15%

As the LP Stimulus Plan went over the expected end-date of Dec 2024, We propose an additional, separate 5% allocation for Dec 2024 onwards, in order to reduce the likelihood of dilution for earlier liquidity providers and also to extend the LP Stimulus Plan. This will be on top of the initial proposed allocation of 10%.

Why the additional 5%?

We saw a significant growth in volume in Jan 2025 onwards. While we want to also reward the active LPs during this time, we want to prevent the dilution of the LPs that provided liquidity before this period – thus, the decision to set two separate allocations for the two timeframes.

We also want to ensure that the retail contributors to Meteora’s growth, especially those who provided liquidity during the early stages of the DLMM, are fairly rewarded – instead of a fully linear system that would favour larger liquidity providers.

With that in mind, we propose to split the 10% allocation into an 8% linear allocation for all users and a 2% fixed allocation for our early contributors. This will replace the points multiplier system proposed in the initial plan.

Why a fixed allocation instead of a multiplier?

The focus here is to reward the most valuable users of Meteora – our early adopters, as well as our long-term liquidity providers.

A multiplier system will only reward our early adopters, leaving out long term liquidity providers who may have joined later. Additionally, a multiplier will heavily skew the rewards towards whales that provided liquidity in the early days instead of the early retail adopters.

With a fixed allocation of 2%, we’ll provide an equitable reward for all our passionate, long-term aligned users, and leave no LP behind.

The 2% allocation will be based on verifiable on-chain criteria, such as wallets providing liquidity across a long period of time (to be decided), and wallets that interacted with Meteora between December 2023 to April 2024.

The final allocation breakdown will be as follows:

  • 8% of points will be distributed in the period of Dec 2023 to Dec 2024.
  • 5% of points will be distributed from Jan 2025 onwards to TGE.
  • 2% to be distributed based on on-chain criteria, with a flat allocation per criteria.

Separate Allocation of 3% for Launch Pools and Launch Pads

We propose an exclusion of launch pools and launch pads from the LP Stimulus Plan to further prevent the dilution of rewards for our retail liquidity providers. In exchange, we will provide a separate allocation of 3% for these stakeholders.

For 2025, our strategy is to make Meteora the center of all token creation activity on Solana – bringing even more users into Meteora, and creating new opportunities for the LP Army.

We propose a separate allocation to reward Launch Pools, alongside building a thriving ecosystem of Launchpads, tools, and more. This includes Launch Pools such as TRUMP and CLOUD, Launchpad integrations like GoFundMeme, Virtuals, ElizaOS and more.

This will help achieve our goals of making Meteora the center of new token creations on Solana.

Blacklisting Bad Actors

We will also be undergoing efforts in excluding Bad Actors from any allocation of MET.

Launch Pools linked to rug pulls, wash trading, or suspicious activity will be blacklisted from receiving MET rewards. We intend to do this in public with the involvement of the community, and will update our progress on the efforts towards this.

By making this process community-driven, we’ll be able to crowdsource an open and transparent blacklist that anyone can verify using on-chain data.

With these proposed changes, we want to focus on fairly rewarding all our stakeholders, from users to launch pools, launchpads and other integrators. We hope this provides more clarity into our key considerations with the proposal, and we thank you again for voicing out your concerns during the Community Call.

43 Likes

very good proposal
if possible increase to 3.5% fixed and provide users who are part before dec 2024 when volume low who had less than $1000 fee
becasue many people lost so much when market is down and stopped providing LP later
after dec 2024 multiple coins went to 100m in a day it was not the case in 2024 and less volume and less users and earning $100-200 fee was tough

8 Likes

I really liked these changes. I understand that it will further strengthen those who use Meteora in the long term, like the tools and can still profit from DeFi on Solana. I also liked the fact that they removed the $MET Airdrop for wallets that promoted pump and dump. Excellent.

3 Likes

Stupid distribution plan. Users in 2025 will also be using real money to do LP. The fee level will also skyrocket after 2025. It is seriously unfair to new users. The implication of insider trading is too obvious.

Good proposal, it sounds like it takes into account the interests of all parties: honest farmers, early participants, and whales have different levels of interest.

Suggestions and thoughts on improving/avoiding Sybil attacks and abusers.
We all understand that insane commissions were a thing in memecoins, but some of them die off within a month/week/day (though they are very active and profitable for LP participants for some time).

-Jupiter already has a token score system, so what if we model some coefficient for points for “good” tokens with a high score (since metrics like volume, number of holders, and others are already factored in there), and reduce it for tokens with a low score.

What about LP Army Private - the proposal isn’t entirely clear, but if this group is among the active users of Meteora, we could add a multiplier based on the date/season of NFT acquisition (each NFT was issued with a note of the bootcamp number)—an earlier certificate gives a higher point multiplier (e.g., x1.3 for Bootcamp 1-3 and x1.05 for Bootcamp 10).

1 Like

Fair enough, Glad to see you guys are giving this enough thought.

10% for 2024 and 5% for 2025 to care early users looks good to me
but 8% for point system and 2% for something does not make any senses to me
Its not fair for users who chased points described in LP stimulus plan.
"2% is TBD " , its possible to reject if 2% is not good design ?
As I remember, there were tons of dicussion about that point system before it began
please keep the poinst sytem as much as possible.
Users took actions based on info. what they got. please respect them.

Simply call 2024 season 1 and 2025 season 2. keep the original rule in both seasons.
That is how care early users while keep promises the team does on LP stimulus campaign imo

1 Like

This seems fair. I believe that it is vital to reward the core users early in 2024 that would LP frequently prior to Meteora metrics significantly increasing. If we looked at how many LP positions opened along with how many months we saw users having active LP positions it would be a great indicator of their contributions.

Really liking the updated one. Rewarding OG’s + making a new allocation for new users seems fair.

Just hoping it won’t take another year to get things going.

1 Like

Fair proposal for early and new users.

Nice proposal @soju. The original point system (where $1 in DLMM fees earned = 1000 points, while $1 in TVL in DLMM every 24H = 1 point) is still the base for point tracking, correct?

Any initial thoughts yet on the “long period of time” providing liquidity for wallet
eligibility for the 2%? 4 months +? 6 months +?

Sounds like a wallet can meet EITHER OR of those 2 criteria (dec 23’-april OR long-term LP’er) – to qualify for the 2%(???)

1 Like

i like this strategy!

I like this proposal. But as all of us almost are into lping on meteora I dont see the linear allocation to be great but I can live with it.

My personal thought and proposal, be kind to retail investors:

  • Tiers for airdrop & Whale Fee Cap (E.g : 1M fee peak)
    -Minimum & Maximum rewards For Everyone

(100% Linear will ruin meteora become Scroll)

4 Likes

We’re relieved to finally see more TGE information; this has been a long time coming. The plan appears solid, however, a fully linear release will likely result in whale-driven sell-offs. A hard cap is strongly advised. Furthermore, the Kamino LP participation points need to be factored in accurately. We look forward to seeing the team’s updates on the points system. Thanks for your dedication.

Current Allocation Plan

Meteora’s current airdrop allocation plan is as follows:

  • 8% of points will be distributed in the period of Dec 2023 to Dec 2024.
  • 5% of points will be distributed from Jan 2025 onwards to TGE.

On the surface, the difference between 8% and 5% is only 3%, making it seem that new users (2025) earn only 37.5% less than old users (2024), which appears relatively fair. However, through analysis of the platform data, I have discovered that this allocation plan creates significant inequity in actual rewards.

Data Analysis: Comparison of 2024 and 2025 Fees

According to the data I’ve compiled (though not 100% precise, it has reference value), Meteora’s DLMM and Dynamic AMM have generated approximately 1200M in fees to date. Of this, projects like TRUMP, MELANIA, LIBRA contributed nearly 300M in fees. Excluding these projects:

  • Fees generated from 2023 to 2024 are approximately 300M
  • Fees generated in 2025 are approximately 600M

This means the ratio of fees between 2024 and 2025 is 1:2. As time progresses, 2025 fees continue to grow, and may reach 900M by TGE (highly likely), further widening this gap.

Actual Reward Comparison: Significant Token Value Disparity

Assuming Meteora’s FDV (Fully Diluted Valuation) at TGE is $1 billion (just an assumption), we can calculate the token value per fee unit for users in 2024 and 2025:

  • 2024: 300M fees allocated 8% of tokens, meaning 1 fee = 0.2667u
  • 2025: 600M fees allocated 5% of tokens, meaning 1 fee = 0.0833u
  • If 2025 fees grow to 900M, then 1 fee = 0.0556u

By comparison, 2024 users receive 3.2 to 4.8 times more token value per fee unit than 2025 users. This demonstrates that the difference between the 8% and 5% allocation ratios creates a disparity in actual rewards far exceeding the superficial 3% difference.

Additional Costs and Risks for 2025 Users

Besides the reward gap, 2025 users face additional burdens:

  1. 5% protocol fee: All 2025 users must pay this fee regardless of profit or loss, increasing participation costs.
  2. Increased competition, risks, and reduced returns: With the iconic event of Trump’s token launch in 2025, Meteora’s platform traffic and funds have increased enormously. Meme LP competition has intensified—for example, some meme projects with only a few million in market cap might have thousands of SOL in their LP, and rug pulls are becoming more frequent and difficult to prevent. For new users, this means significantly higher entry barriers and risks, with notably lower returns.

Some argue that meme LP in 2024 was more challenging than in 2025, but this may not be the case. Blockchain transparency enables the Meteora team to easily filter out the number of users and amounts lost in both 2024 and 2025, which can be simply verified through data comparison.

Fairness Discussion: Both New and Old Users Should Benefit

Meteora’s success is inseparable from the early support of 2024 users, but its future development and growth equally depend on new users joining in 2025.

It’s worth noting that new and old users are not in opposition—many 2024 users continue to participate in 2025, while 2025 new users will become the backbone of the platform.

However, under the current allocation plan, 2024 users receive significantly higher rewards than 2025 users. This imbalance may discourage new users, which is detrimental to Meteora’s long-term ecosystem development. A fair allocation plan should better balance the contributions and returns of both new and old users—old users should receive more, new users less, but the difference should not be 3-5 times (simply dividing by time periods is a lazy approach).

Conclusion and Recommendations

In summary, Meteora’s airdrop allocation ratios of 8% and 5% appear close, but the actual reward gap is as high as 3.2 to 4.8 times, and 2025 users also face higher costs and risks with lower returns.

This design is unfair to new users. I recommend that the Meteora team reconsider their allocation plan by adjusting ratios or introducing compensation mechanisms to ensure both new and old users receive reasonable benefits. Only then can continuous participation from both sides be encouraged, promoting the healthy development of the Meteora ecosystem.

P.S. English is not my first language. This article was created with the help of AI translation. If you have any questions, we can discuss them together.

4 Likes

Additional Clarification:

As what Ben Chow initially said in the LP Stimulus Plan, we will conduct more discussions on the distribution of points being via a tiered system.

5 Likes

The team has generally balanced everyone’s interests, but it would be a significant improvement to increase the 2% allocation. This was before the memecoin boom, and their limited capital restricted any risk-taking opportunities.

Minimum cap is unfair to big wholes :sadcat:
No minimum cap is also a destruction to retail investors:pepewoke:

So let’s go for a middle value, giving very little minimum rewards with setting a high threshold, and the top big users will not get the project-level chips alone.

1 Like

100% Linear will ruin the project.
Tiers are the best proposal
Top level taking some foods and share the next level of people, thats the Utopia plan:pepeprotect:

we do not like Platform proposal

1 Like