[DRAFT] Proposal: Distribute 3% out of the TGE Reserve to Jupiter Stakers

[elestify]

I think it’s a good choice with jupiters. Hope the will be rewarded everyone.

[Dolphin]

i think that abit unfair, am proposing an increase for Jup Staker, possibly 4% is fare

[azuko.sol]

I like the idea of ​​promoting something for JUP stakers, we need to value partner ecosystems like JUP. Just do the proper verification and be strict with stakers. For example, a minimum stake of +1,000 JUP to receive x amount, having participated in all votes, something like that.

[njlizhi]

As an LPer for 15 months I feel humiliated. Everyone can come and snatch my chips—Soju, have you ever considered how much risk LPers endure every single day? In 2025 we contributed $550M in fees but only received 5%. And what exactly have JUP stakers done for us? What has MER done? Turning against the community will only accelerate the project’s collapse. If this is the allocation ratio I will dump all my tokens at TGE immediately.

[thejohnny]

@soju

We did it because of community concerns on dilution. This way, there is actually no dilution thanks to using it from the 5%.

I fully understand your concern, but I think its manageable because the recipetents will be receiving NFT, as in liquidity.

Initial Plan: Team deposits 3%, keeps 3% in treasury

Now: Team Deposits 3%, distributes 3% to the community.

As you can see, actually the liquidity at TGE is maintained. I further intend to campaign and encourage the community to deposit their tokens into the liquidity pool when they can view their allocation, this will further bolster liquidity if necessary.

My concern with liquidity vesting/locking is that liquidity will become predictably volatile → price can be attacked easily. So i didnt want to do that

From here i do understand this is not a proposal at all , this is actually an announcement …
Kind of WE decided and we do , who the hell are you at all
Actually point is not airdropping JUP community but %3 its too higher should be max %1 … This is only punishing the small traders , whales are getting already good airdrop but what about small traders ?
Anyone cares about us not on WORDS but on ACTIONS ?

If team really wants to make a FAIR proposal Do it via survey , and check what community wants…

[DrDanielCGrace]

I’d prefer you to create a Test token and interate whatever experience you get from there just like TestJUP

[qo522522]

(aka yes because because i hold jup a lot )

[stasonelison]

First you write “hopefully we hit 1b in airdrop value,” and now you say 3b fdv is too much. o_O

[d4ve.sdc]

Thanks Soju
We deeply appreciate your continuous effort and dedication

I fully agree with your new proposal. Distributing 3% of the TGE Reserve to Jupiter Stakers through Liquidity Position NFTs is a smart way

[ferdinandoff]

My take might not be the easiest to hear, but let’s talk numbers. You propose allocating 3% to JUP stakers - roughly 0.05 MET per staked JUP - while Mercurial stakeholders received 5% of JUP. When the $LIBRA fiasco unfolded, JUP stakers were hit the hardest: the price plunged ~40% in just a few days, even as the broader market remained stable. Jupiter’s support back then is what allowed Meteora to survive and as I’ve said, JUP stakers ultimately paid the highest price.

Now you’re willing to allocate 2% to $m3m3 holders and only 3% to JUP stakers. Most of us never unstaked - not even for a single day - for over 18 months. The recent bootcamp proved how dedicated the Jupiverse is : I am confident it had the strongest turnout yet.

Of course, you can’t satisfy everyone, nor should you, but fairness matters - and 3% simply doesn’t feel fair. I understand the argument that free money is free money, but in this case it’s not: if the $LIBRA situation had escalated further, we would’ve borne the cost despite having no involvement.

You want to 10x the LP army - and you can. It’s all about execution. Just my two cents.

[pajamas]

3%-5% is OK.

It is considered as adding new users base to try Meteroa.

[limecoii]

So apparently lpers are betrayed.

2025 lpers get 5% while jup stakers get 3%?

Get this to voting for MET governance AFTER TGE. If you need to give some airdrop to Jup, do it right by governance.

[leonexotic]

I am absolutely shocked and out of words.

There is literally 0 (ZERO!) reason why anyone should think this is a good or reasonable idea. Especially team members who care for their community and users.

Why should there be 3% allocated to people that did nothing, especially didn’t risk anything while there is only 5% allocated to user that ACTIVELY USED, GREW and RISKED CAPITAL TO STRENGTHEN YOUR PRODUCT during H1 2025.

This makes absolutely no sense and would only proof that you truly don’t care about neither your users and community nor the token price action.

Otherwise you would align tokenomics and community/ user incentives.

Personally, as a longterm JUP holder and staker, I would be against any allocation for non users of Meteora; but if the team sees value and reasons to believe it helps growing the community then it should be max 0.5-1% (at best, still a huge amount of free money for not having any skin in the game).

As a big Meteora user and supporter since the early days I am very disappointed by this proposal, even the consideration of such a disproportional allocation for non users that didn’t actively put capital at risk or even trying out the product shows that the team apparently is not aligned with the core community and users that are the reason for today’s success.

I really hope you and the whole team reconsider this and won’t make such a blatant misallocation.

Thank you for reading this long ass wall of text.

[zinmasterr]

I appreciate the shout-out to Jupiter, but I’m not on board with this plan. Giving 3% of the TGE reserve to Jupiter stakers is still dilution—it just shifts the pie even if we call it “no extra tokens.” It also rewards a group that might not stick around, and it limits the reserve we need for liquidity, growth, or future listings. If we want to recognize Jupiter, I’d rather see a smaller, KPI-based incentive or a co-marketing push that drives long-term engagement instead of a one-time drop.

[twomilincoming]

This proposal is a non-starter. You can dress it up as “no extra tokens,” but it’s still dilution.

Giving away 3% of the TGE reserve to Jupiter stakers is a slap in the face to everyone that worked hard and risked their time and money LPing.

MANY of us lost money LPing, don’t act like it was all walk in the park and we all made ez money.

[Junseiyuri]

Cool idea to recognize Jupiter, but 3% is too big. That reserve is our safety net for launch and listings. If we do something, keep it tiny and tied to long-term LP activity. Handing out 3% to Jupiter stakers cuts everyone else’s share and doesn’t guarantee they’ll stick around. We should keep that reserve for future plans, not a one-time thank-you. If we want to recognize Jupiter, I’d rather see a smaller, KPI-based incentive or a co-marketing push that drives long-term engagement instead of a one-time drop.

[GeekLad]

@soju There are a lot of concerns about the size of the allocation negatively affecting the price if and when JUP stakers dump MET. How about instead of distributing them the LP token, you distribute them a 3% allocation of the USDC proceeds from the TGE?

[WEBBING]

Kudos Soju, group of every individual can never be satisfied with different backgrounds for every opinions and proposals every community members can’t totally agreed. Whatever decisions all the best for TG.

[senior2751]

This is a better game plan. Do you have any plan to take impermanent loss into consideration for tge requirements??

[process]

The NFT distribution is a good initiative, looking forward to how it will playout while earn fees. My question is will users start earning fees immediately or till after they execute claim function?