I trust you. Hope everything will be ok. Good luck and keep doing good work!
Really thoughtful and well-structured proposal ā love how it balances long-term incentives with immediate TGE needs.
Fully support this direction ā smart and community-first approach.
2 Likes
Has there been any thought given to creating a metric or reward mechanism for LPs who have generated significant fees but ended up with little actual profit? Speaking for myself, I usually only dare to allocate $100ā$500 worth of SOL per position. Iāve opened many positions and cumulatively earned over $10,000 in fees. However, due to the fast-changing market, some positions quickly turned into losses. In the end, my net profit might be only around $2,000. Even so, Iām still actively learning and trying to improve as an LP.
To improve the proposal for allocating 25% of MET tokens to liquidity incentives and TGE reserves, I suggest the following:
Proposal Enhancement: Allocate a Portion of Liquidity Rewards to Smaller, Active Users with a Dynamic Reward Mechanism
-
Details:
-
From the 20% allocated for liquidity mining rewards, 5% (one-quarter of it) should be reserved for users providing smaller liquidity amounts (e.g., under $10,000). This encourages participation from smaller users and reduces reward concentration among large players (whales).
-
Implement a dynamic reward mechanism that grants higher rewards based on duration of liquidity provision and fees generated by the pool. For example, users maintaining liquidity for at least 90 days could receive a 1.5x reward multiplier.
-
-
Benefits:
-
Greater Inclusivity: Smaller users, a significant part of Meteoraās community, will be incentivized to participate.
-
Long-Term Loyalty: Encouraging sustained liquidity provision enhances pool stability.
-
Attracting New Users: A dynamic mechanism can draw new users to the platform, especially in Solanaās competitive ecosystem.
-
-
Implementation:
- Meteora can integrate this mechanism using smart contracts on its platform.
This is a very good proposal. Everyone is part of Meteora. We are looking forward to the future of Meteora. Let us work hard.
This is such an awesome proposal, I know the team have best strategy to stabilise the performance of $MET after TGE and I believe the 20% will also boost liquidity engagement after launch of $MET and community engagement.
I think team Meteora have good planned in place to reward real users with a metric of how long you add liquidity and I think base on volume as well.
Overall interesting proposal from you.
But wonāt that just mean giving tokens away if thereās no inherent value return for the $MET token?
Yeah my honest opinion.
-
5% is little for MM for 40% circulating supply on day 1, thereās a huge imbalance especially if you compare it to Jupās launch of 5% liquidity for 13% circulating although you might consider the fact that they donāt have the LP army.
-
Personally I would be supplying most of tokens for liquidity on day one(if I get any as an lp army private) but itās speculative as hell to expect much liquidity provision on day one from LP Army so Iām calling on the team to increase the MM supply by twice to make it 10% at least.
-
Looking at how launches have been performing lately I suggest we get a complete plan of how to maintain and sustain the utility of the $MET token on day one of launch.
-
If changes can be made to benchowās lp stimulus plan, Iād suggest that points be counted for losses incurred from impermanent losses too
5% is too low. 10% at least
Great proposal and great Idea from the team but I have few questions I will like to ask.
How will the Liquidity Rewards Reserve address the risk of impermanent loss for LPs, particularly during volatile market conditions or for pools with less stable token pairs? And
further more, Considering the 5% TGE Reserve is deemed on the low end for a 40% initial circulating supply, what contingency plans are in place if the LP Armyās liquidity provision falls short of expectations? Will additional $MET be allocated, or will external liquidity sources be tapped?
I think at day one team canāt real give perfect details on how to sustain the utility than it be a governance Token of Meteora. Investors and community can only decides that if they find the token worth to hold and work in principle with idea of team because on launching day their might be some kind of manipulation from especially large holders but as time goes the utility propose from the team or community can help to shape the long term value of token not at launch. The most common utility team sometimes proposed is stake to get more token which Iām actually expecting new patterns from materials team but nevertheless Iām bullish on $MET.
If you said 5% is too low, did you want team to increase circulating supply of $MET ? or what plans are you planning to propose to help the team.
hi fam, there should be an option to claim met airdrops as liquid and a bonus should be provided to those who do so. For example, instead of claiming and selling directly, you can earn a % bonus by claiming to certain pools determined by the team. Incentivizing airdrop users to be liquid. locking these pools as 1 month, 3 months, 6 months and 1 year options and giving bonuses accordingly. In this way, you can earn bonus met and the daily fees accumulated from the pool. win win.
1 Like
Yeah nice idea. Broā¤ļø
1 Like
I understand your point, but sincerely what Iām asking for is not to predict market movements but Iām optimistic that the team can put in place strategy to ensure day one utility for $MET and also to incentivize holding.
Look at hyperliquid & solayer
1 Like
Alright, The only day one utility is, itās Governance token of Meteora.
Hyperliquid fine but Solayer doesnāt really did their community well except those who got presale slot with chance.
1 Like
your idea is good
but unfortunately people will use in wrong way also
i can provide $1000 in 100 accounts and leave like that if they reward sperately i make more rewards tha normal users